1 Requests granted 350 Total requests

Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge.

The Wikimedia projects make up one of the world’s largest repositories of human knowledge. With that much information, someone is bound to get upset by some of the content from time to time. While the vast majority of content disputes are resolved by users themselves, in some extreme cases the Wikimedia Foundation may receive a legal demand to override our users.

The Wikimedia projects are yours, not ours. People just like you from around the world write, upload, edit, and curate all of the content. Therefore, we believe users should decide what belongs on Wikimedia projects whenever legally possible.

Below, you will find more information about the number of requests we receive, where they come from, and how they could impact free knowledge. You can also learn more about how we fight for freedom of speech through our user assistance programs in the FAQ.

This report covers requests we received between January and June, 2024. For historical data, please see our past reports.

Alteration and takedown requests from governments

36 Government requests

Requests for content alteration and takedown

Government requests36
Other314

Government requests breakdown

CountryEntityRequests
FrancePoliticians, Candidates, and Political Parties1
GermanyLocal Agency
Federal Agency
1
1
IndiaFederal Agency1
IndonesiaFederal Agency1
ItalyPoliticians, Candidates, and Political Parties1
PakistanFederal Agency2
Russian FederationFederal Agency22
SwitzerlandCity Police1
The Republic of South KoreaNational Agency1
TurkeyNational Agency1
UkraineDistrict Court1
United States of AmericaDistrict Court
Local Agency
1
1

Requests for content alteration and takedown by project

Project AffectedRequestsGranted
English Wikipedia790
French Wikipedia651
Wikimedia Commons390
German Wikipedia240
Multiple Projects190
Russian Wikipedia180
Not a Wikimedia Site150
Wikidata130
Spanish Wikipedia80
Turkish Wikipedia70
Italian Wikipedia50
Portuguese Wikipedia50
Chinese Wikipedia40
Czech Wikipedia30
Dutch Wikipedia30
Japanese Wikipedia30
Polish Wikipedia30
Farsi Wikipedia20
Hebrew Wikipedia20
Korean Wikipedia20
Russian Wikinews20
Turkish Wikisource20
Arabic Wikipedia10
Bahasa Wikipedia10
Bangla Wikipedia10
Catalan Wikipedia10
Croatian Wikitionary10
English Wikitionary10
Galician Wikipedia10
Georgian Wikipedia10
Greek Wikipedia10
Hebrew Wikibooks10
Hungarian Wikipedia10
Norwegian Wikipedia10
Russian Wikibooks10
Swedish Wikipedia10
Ukrainian Wikipedia10
Unknown120

Requests for content alteration and takedown by country

Country of OriginRequestsGranted
United States of America400
Germany280
Russian Federation240
France161
Turkey110
United Kingdom100
Pakistan80
Italy60
Canada50
India50
Spain50
Japan40
Brazil30
Iran30
Netherlands30
Poland30
The Republic of South Korea30
Sweden30
Australia20
Greece20
Indonesia20
Israel20
Portugal20
Algeria10
Argentina10
Austria10
Bolivia10
Bulgaria10
Chad10
Chile10
China10
Czech Republic10
Estonia10
Finland10
Hungary10
Ireland10
Kazakhstan10
Malaysia10
Malta10
Myanmar10
Norway10
Switzerland10
Taiwan10
Ukraine10
Unknown1390

Child Safety Reports

50 CyberTipline Reports Submitted 145 Subsequent Content Actions 48 Subsequent Account Actions

The Wikimedia movement of volunteers, along with the Wikimedia Foundation, have developed and tailored practices to address potentially illegal content on Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects.

Robust community-led content moderation processes provide the first line of defense. While automated tools are used to support existing community processes, the bulk of this work is done manually across Wikimedia projects.

Situations involving actual or suspected Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) are escalated to the Foundation’s Trust & Safety sensitive content team to address. This team utilizes PhotoDNA, an automated tool, to identify known CSAM images and videos and report them to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), a nonprofit that refers cases to law enforcement agencies around the world. 

While CSAM has been found on Wikimedia projects, it is very rare. When actual or suspected CSAM is identified, we immediately lock the account(s) that upload the content and escalate the information to NCMEC’s CyberTipline, as required by law. Each report to NCMEC may involve one or more pieces of content. For our annual CyberTipline report totals from previous years, please see: 2023; 2022; 2021; 2020; 2019.

Right to Erasure

0 Requests granted 11 Total requests

The Right to Erasure, or Right to be Forgotten, is a right under the laws of various countries that allows individuals to request that certain information relating to them be delisted or removed.

When we receive a Right to Erasure request regarding project content, we first direct the requester to experienced project volunteers, who routinely handle most requests to change content on the projects. Wikimedia projects have guidelines for content about living persons, and the volunteer community can review the guidelines and work with the requester to address their concerns.

When we receive a request relating to a user account, we provide the user information on the community-driven vanishing process. See the account-related requests section below for more detail on these requests.

We believe in a Right to Remember. Everyone should have free access to relevant and neutral information of public concern; delisting and removing such content from the internet harms our collective ability to remember history and understand the world. In October 2016, we filed a petition to intervene in Google’s appeal of a French administrative order that would expand such delistings from the European Union to all global domains. In March 2020, following a ruling by the European Court of Justice limiting the geographic scope of such removals, the French court quashed the order, and the French agency behind it has adjusted its position.

* Please note that this information only reflects requests made directly to us. Wikimedia project pages continue to disappear from search engine results without any notice or request to us. We have a dedicated page where we post notices of delisted project pages that we have received from the search engines who provide such information as part of their own commitments to transparency.

Account related requests

3,652 Account deletion requests 26 Unblock requests

Many of the requests we receive ask for changes to project content, or request that we provide data about our users. However, some requests pertain to user accounts.

Account deletion

When we receive a request to delete a user’s account, we provide the user information on the community-driven vanishing process. Prior to July 2019, account deletion requests were reported in the “Right to Erasure” section. We are now reporting these requests separately in order to give users additional clarity on the types of requests we receive.

Unblock Requests

On occasion, a user who has been blocked by the community may contact the Foundation to request that we take action to reverse the block. The Foundation supports the community’s ability to issue blocks in order to protect users and the projects, and appeals to us when a user has been blocked for disruptive behavior will not result in reinstatement.

Photo credits