Requests for content alteration and takedown

Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge.

The Wikimedia projects make up one of the world’s largest repositories of human knowledge. With that much information, someone is bound to get upset by some of the content from time to time. While the vast majority of content disputes are resolved by users themselves, in some extreme cases the Wikimedia Foundation may receive a legal demand to override our users.

The Wikimedia projects are yours, not ours. People just like you from around the world write, upload, edit, and curate all of the content. Therefore, we believe users should decide what belongs on Wikimedia projects whenever legally possible.

Below, you will find more information about the number of requests we receive, where they come from, and how they could impact free knowledge. You can also learn more about how we fight for freedom of speech through our user assistance programs in the FAQ.

This report covers requests we received between January and June, 2019. For historical data, please see our archived report.

0 Requests granted 292 Total requests for alteration and takedown

Government requests breakdown

CountryEntityRequests
AustraliaRegional court1
FrancePoliticians, Candidates, and Political Parties1
IndiaPoliticians, Candidates, and Political Parties1
ItalyPostal Police1
JordanPoliticians, Candidates, and Political Parties1
United KingdomPoliticians, Candidates, and Political Parties1

Where did these requests come from?

Requests by countryRequestsGranted
United States of America620
Germany220
United Kingdom160
India140
France130
Italy90
Australia60
Brazil60
Canada50
Netherlands40
Russia40
Spain40
Austria30
Czech Republic20
Denmark20
Japan20
Poland20
Romania20
Venezuela20
Armenia10
Belgium10
Bulgaria10
Chile10
China10
Colombia10
Dominica10
Croatia10
Ecuador10
Finland10
Guinea10
Hong Kong10
Hungary10
Iceland10
Ireland10
Kazakhstan10
Korea10
Mongolia10
Portugal10
Sweden10
United Arab Emirates10
Unknown910

Which Wikimedia projects were targeted?

Requests by Wikimedia projectRequestsGranted
English Wikipedia1170
Wikimedia Commons250
German Wikipedia220
Not a Wikimedia Foundation site150
French Wikipedia100
Multiple projects90
Portuguese Wikipedia90
Russian Wikipedia80
Spanish Wikipedia70
Italian Wikipedia70
Dutch Wikipedia40
Polish Wikipedia30
Chinese Wikipedia20
Czech Wikipedia20
Danish Wikipedia20
English Wiktionary20
Farsi Wikipedia20
Japanese Wikipedia20
Swedish Wikipedia20
Bosnian Wikipedia10
Catalan Wikipedia10
Dutch Wikibooks10
English Wikivoyage10
Finnish Wikipedia10
Hungarian Wikipedia10
Armenian Wikipedia10
Korean Wikipedia10
Mongolian Wikipedia10
Romanian Wikipedia10
Russian Wikisource10
Simple English Wikipedia10
French Wiktionary10
Wikimania 201410
Wikidata10
Unknown270

Right to Erasure

0 Requests granted 11 Total requests

The Right to Erasure, or Right to be Forgotten, is a right under the laws of various countries that allows individuals to request that certain information relating to them be delisted or removed.

When we receive a Right to Erasure request regarding project content, we first direct the requester to experienced project volunteers, who routinely handle most requests to change content on the projects. Wikimedia projects have guidelines for content about living persons, and the volunteer community can review the guidelines and work with the requester to address their concerns. During this reporting period, we received 11 requests to alter or takedown project content based upon the Right to Erasure.

When we receive a request relating to a user account, we provide the user information on the community-driven vanishing process. See the account-related requests section below for more detail on these requests.

We believe in a Right to Remember. Everyone should have free access to relevant and neutral information of public concern; delisting and removing such content from the internet harms our collective ability to remember history and understand the world. In October 2016, we filed a petition to intervene in Google’s appeal of a French administrative order that would expand such delistings from the European Union to all global domains. In July 2017, the French Supreme Court asked the European Court of Justice to address questions regarding the scope of right to erasure delistings, and we have submitted a filing to the ECJ presenting our concerns.

* Please note that this information only reflects requests made directly to us. Wikimedia project pages continue to disappear from search engine results without any notice or request to us. We have a dedicated page where we post notices of delisted project pages that we have received from the search engines who provide such information as part of their own commitments to transparency.

Account related requests

216 Account deletion requests 18 Unblock requests

Many of the requests we receive ask for changes to project content, or request that we provide data about our users. However, some requests pertain to user accounts. In this section, we report on these account-related requests.

Please note that the numbers below provide totals for the number of user accounts to which these requests relate. This number may not reflect the number of unique individuals who made a request related to their account, since an individual may have multiple accounts across all Wikimedia projects, and we record each user account separately. As a result, this number might overestimate the number of people who made such requests.

Account deletion

When we receive a request to delete a user’s account, we provide the user information on the community-driven vanishing process. Prior to the July 2019, account deletion requests were reported in the “Right to Erasure” section. We are now reporting these requests separately in order to give users additional clarity on the types of requests we receive.

Unblock Requests

The vast majority of the Wikimedia community of contributors are focused on productive additions to the projects’ store of knowledge. Occasionally, however, some users will engage in vandalism or other disruptive behavior. In these cases, trusted users who have been elected by their communities to have advanced rights may take action to block disruptive users.

On occasion, a user who has been blocked by the community may contact the Foundation to request that we take action to reverse the block. Here, we report the number of such requests we received in the last six months. The Foundation supports the community’s ability to issue blocks in order to protect users and the projects, and appeals to us when a user has been blocked for disruptive behavior will not result in reinstatement.